4.5 Article

Experimental analyses of diversity partitioning in southern hemisphere algal communities

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 190, Issue 1, Pages 179-193

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04375-3

Keywords

Marine; Rocky reef; Macroalgae; Diversity; Beta diversity; Impact; Algal canopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation of Research Science and Technology
  2. National Science Challenge Sustainable Seas Tipping Point project
  3. MBIE
  4. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (OBI funding)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how biodiversity and its components of alpha, beta, and gamma vary over spatial and temporal scales and across communities is crucial to mitigating stressors of ecosystems. Marine communities present several problems in partitioning diversity over fine spatial scales, such as tidal zones, and temporal scales relating to seasonal occurrences of species and recovery responses to impacts. This study uses an experimental approach to test disturbance effects on beta diversity in algal communities in southern New Zealand. Dominant canopies in mid-shore Hormosira banksii and low-shore Durvillaea poha communities were removed and diversity metrics assessed, including additive partitioning, permutational dispersion, and nestedness and turnover analyses. Over 2years, 258 species were found. Species richness was greater where canopies remained intact in Hormosira communities compared to removal plots, but, in Durvillaea communities, controls and removals had similar richness. In both communities, -diversity was 1.5-3.9 times greater than -diversity, with the temporal component (t) being 1.2-2.4x greater than the spatial component. Hormosira communities exhibited high nestedness, with species in removal plots being a subset of those in controls. In Durvillaea communities, however, turnover was high and nestedness low, because removal plots had a different species assemblage than controls. Multivariate analyses showed that species occurrences and abundances remained different in controls and removals in both communities over 2years. Differences in diversity components between communities were related to environmental differences to which they are exposed, including desiccation and wave forces, and the relative importance of facilitation and competition in the different communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available