4.4 Article

Modified-ESD Plus APC and Suturing for Treatment of Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 2001-2002

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-03808-5

Keywords

Obesity; Bariatric surgery; Endoscopy; TORe; Recidivism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Mechanisms for weight regain after gastric bypass are not fully understood and the process is likely multifactorial. The initial step in the management of weight regain is a comprehensive evaluation of contributing factors. While lifestyle modification is fundamental, it has limited efficacy which can be enhanced by medications and/or endoscopic revision. Anatomic changes such as larger pouch size and dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) may contribute to increased postoperative weight gain. Endoluminal revisions offer an effective and less invasive management strategy for this population. Methods A 55-year-old female with history of RYGB in 2006 presented with weight regain. She was referred to our unit for endoscopic evaluation. Results During endoscopy, a large GJA (25mm in diameter) was diagnosed. A novel trans-oral outlet reduction (TORe) was then performed. A modified ESD was first performed on the GJA, followed by argon plasma coagulation of the margins of the ESD. Then a purse-string TORe with suturing was performed, using a 10mm balloon to size the GJA. On 6-month follow-up, patient lost 20lb. and 12.26 %TBWL and EGD showed a 10mm diameter GJA. On 1-year follow-up, patient weight loss was 14lb. and 8.58 %TBWL. The follow-up endoscopy showed a 12mm diameter GJA. Conclusion Endoluminal therapies are safe, reproducible, and effective in the treatment of weight regain and should be utilized as a first-line approach to manage this condition. This novel-combined approach is feasible and may be more effective in the treatment of weight regain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available