4.5 Article

Gyrokinetic analysis and simulation of pedestals to identify the culprits for energy losses using 'fingerprints'

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab1fa2

Keywords

H-mode; pedestal; transport; micro tearing mode; electron temperature gradient mode; fingerprint; kinetic ballooning mode

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER54742, DE-AC02-09CH11466]
  2. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  3. Texas Advanced Computing Center
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [DE-FC02-04ER54698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusion performance in tokamaks hinges critically on the efficacy of the edge transport barrier (ETB) in suppressing energy losses. The new concept of 'fingerprints' is introduced to identify the instabilities that cause transport losses in the ETBs of many of today's experiments, from among widely posited candidates. Analysis of the gyrokinetic-Maxwell equations and gyrokinetic simulations of experiments reveals that each mode type produces characteristic ratios of transport in the various channels: density, heat, and impurities. This, together with experimental observations of transport in some channel or of the relative size of the driving sources of channels, can identify or determine the dominant modes causing energy transport. In multiple H-mode cases with edge-localized modes that are examined, these fingerprints indicate that magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)-like modes are apparently not the dominant agent of energy transport; rather, this role is played by micro-tearing modes (MTMs) and electron temperature gradient (ETG) modes, and in addition, possibly by ion temperature gradient/ trapped electron modes (ITG/TEM) on JET (Joint European 'Torus). MHD-like modes may dominate the electron particle losses. Fluctuation frequency can also be an important means of identification, and is often closely related to the transport fingerprint. The analytical arguments unify and explain previously disparate experimental observations on multiple devices, including DIII-D, JET, and ASDEX-U. Detailed simulations of two DIII-D ETBs also demonstrate and corroborate this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available