4.5 Review

Merging new-age biomarkers and nanodiagnostics for precision prostate cancer management

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 302-317

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0178-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  2. University of Queensland Graduate School International Travel Award
  3. National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia [CG 1207]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP 140104006, DP 160102836]
  5. Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital Foundation
  6. US National Institutes of Health
  7. US Department of Defense
  8. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  9. A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accurate identification and stratified treatment of clinically significant early-stage prostate cancer have been ongoing concerns since the outcomes of large international prostate cancer screening trials were reported. The controversy surrounding clinical and cost benefits of prostate cancer screening has highlighted the lack of strategies for discriminating high-risk disease (that requires early treatment) from low-risk disease (that could be managed using watchful waiting or active surveillance). Advances in molecular subtyping and multiomics nanotechnology-based prostate cancer risk delineation can enable refinement of prostate cancer molecular taxonomy into clinically meaningful and treatable subtypes. Furthermore, the presence of intertumoural and intratumoural heterogeneity in prostate cancer warrants the development of novel nanodiagnostic technologies to identify clinically significant prostate cancer in a rapid, cost-effective and accurate manner. Circulating and urinary next-generation prostate cancer biomarkers for disease molecular subtyping and the newest complementary nanodiagnostic platforms for enhanced biomarker detection are promising tools for precision prostate cancer management. However, challenges in merging both aspects and clinical translation still need to be overcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available