4.8 Article

The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 716-729

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0439-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strauss Institute
  2. Gilead Sciences International Research Scholars Program in Liver Disease
  3. Crown Human Genome Center
  4. Else Kroener Fresenius Foundation
  5. European Research Council
  6. Israel Science Foundation
  7. Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences
  8. Gurwin Family Fund for Scientific Research
  9. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  10. Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research
  11. Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science
  12. Adelis Foundation
  13. Marie Curie Integration grant
  14. German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development
  15. Minerva Foundation
  16. Rising Tide Foundation
  17. Helmholtz Foundation
  18. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumption of over-the-counter probiotics for promotion of health and well-being has increased worldwide in recent years. However, although probiotic use has been greatly popularized among the general public, there are conflicting clinical results for many probiotic strains and formulations. Emerging insights from microbiome research enable an assessment of gut colonization by probiotics, strain-level activity, interactions with the indigenous microbiome, safety and impacts on the host, and allow the association of probiotics with physiological effects and potentially useful medical indications. In this Perspective, we highlight key advances, challenges and limitations in striving toward an unbiased interpretation of the large amount of data regarding over-the-counter probiotics, and propose avenues to improve the quality of evidence, transparency, public awareness and regulation of their use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available