4.8 Article

Utility of ctDNA to support patient selection for early phase clinical trials: the TARGET study

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 738-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0380-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Christie Charitable Fund
  2. Cancer Research UK (CRUK) [A27412]
  3. CRUK Manchester Centre [A25254]
  4. CRUK Manchester Experimental Cancer Medicines Centre [A25146]
  5. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  6. NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility
  7. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
  8. AstraZeneca iDECIDE Programme [119106]
  9. CRUK Precision Panc grant [C480/A25235]
  10. EU IMI consortium CANCER-ID [115749]
  11. Roche Products, Ltd. through the provision of the Foundation Medicine tumor profiling service
  12. PCRF 2012 Project Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) supports blood-based genomic profiling but is not yet routinely implemented in the setting of a phase I trials clinic. TARGET is a molecular profiling program with the primary aim to match patients with a broad range of advanced cancers to early phase clinical trials on the basis of analysis of both somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNA) across a 641 cancer-associated-gene panel in a single ctDNA assay. For the first 100 TARGET patients, ctDNA data showed good concordance with matched tumor and results were turned round within a clinically acceptable timeframe for Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) review. When a 2.5% variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was applied, actionable mutations were identified in 41 of 100 patients, and 11 of these patients received a matched therapy. These data support the application of ctDNA in this early phase trial setting where broad genomic profiling of contemporaneous tumor material enhances patient stratification to novel therapies and provides a practical template for bringing routinely applied blood-based analyses to the clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available