4.8 Article

CD22 blockade restores homeostatic microglial phagocytosis in ageing brains

Journal

NATURE
Volume 568, Issue 7751, Pages 187-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1088-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01-AG045034, DP1-AG053015, F30AG060638]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM059907]
  4. NOMIS Foundation
  5. Glenn Foundation for Aging Research
  6. Stanford University Medical Scientist Training Program [T32GM007365]
  7. Big Idea Brain Rejuvenation Project from the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute
  8. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  9. Stanford Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine [NIH S10OD020141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microglia maintain homeostasis in the central nervous system through phagocytic clearance of protein aggregates and cellular debris. This function deteriorates during ageing and neurodegenerative disease, concomitant with cognitive decline. However, the mechanisms of impaired microglial homeostatic function and the cognitive effects of restoring this function remain unknown. We combined CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens with RNA sequencing analysis to discover age-related genetic modifiers of microglial phagocytosis. These screens identified CD22, a canonical B cell receptor, as a negative regulator of phagocytosis that is upregulated on aged microglia. CD22 mediates the anti-phagocytic effect of alpha 2,6-linked sialic acid, and inhibition of CD22 promotes the clearance of myelin debris, amyloid-beta oligomers and alpha-synuclein fibrils in vivo. Long-term central nervous system delivery of an antibody that blocks CD22 function reprograms microglia towards a homeostatic transcriptional state and improves cognitive function in aged mice. These findings elucidate a mechanism of age-related microglial impairment and a strategy to restore homeostasis in the ageing brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available