4.8 Article

Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole

Journal

NATURE
Volume 569, Issue 7758, Pages 688-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1241-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The entropy of a black hole(1) and Hawking radiation(2) should have the same temperature given by the surface gravity, within a numerical factor of the order of unity. In addition, Hawking radiation should have a thermal spectrum, which creates an information paradox(3,4). However, the thermality should be limited by greybody factors(5), at the very least(6). It has been proposed that the physics of Hawking radiation could be verified in an analogue system(7), an idea that has been carefully studied and developed theoretically(8-18). Classical white-hole analogues have been investigated experimentally(19-21), and other analogue systems have been presented(22,23). The theoretical works and our long-term study of this subject(15,24-27) enabled us to observe spontaneous Hawking radiation in an analogue black hole(28). The observed correlation spectrum showed thermality at the lowest and highest energies, but the overall spectrum was not of the thermal form, and no temperature could be ascribed to it. Theoretical studies of our observation made predictions about the thermality and Hawking temperature(29-33). Here we construct an analogue black hole with improvements compared with our previous setup, such as reduced magnetic field noise, enhanced mechanical and thermal stability and redesigned optics. We find that the correlation spectrum of Hawking radiation agrees well with a thermal spectrum, and its temperature is given by the surface gravity, confirming the predictions of Hawking's theory. The Hawking radiation observed is in the regime of linear dispersion, in analogy with a real black hole, and the radiation inside the black hole is composed of negative-energy partner modes only, as predicted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available