4.7 Article

The metal-rich halo tail extended in |z|: a characterization with Gaia DR2 and APOGEE

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 487, Issue 1, Pages 1462-1479

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1299

Keywords

Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: disc; Galaxy: formation; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content; Stars: abundances

Funding

  1. ANR [14-CE33-014-01]
  2. CONACyT of Mexico [241732]
  3. FONDECYT [3180210]
  4. PAPIIT of Mexico [IA101217, IA101517]
  5. MINECO of Spain [AYA2015-65205-P]
  6. Physics Frontier Center/JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements (JINA-CEE) - US National Science Foundation [PHY 14-30152]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA-2017-88254-P]
  8. FAPESP [2017/15893-1]
  9. Centre national d'etudes spatiales (CNES) [0101973]
  10. UTINAM Institute of the Universite de Franche-Comte - Region de Franche-Comte
  11. Institut des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  12. Region de Franche-Comte
  13. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  14. U. S. Department of EnergyOffice of Science
  15. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  16. BPG
  17. Carnegie Institution for Science
  18. Carnegie Mellon University
  19. Chilean Participation Group
  20. French Participation Group
  21. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  22. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  23. Johns Hopkins University
  24. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  25. Korean Participation Group
  26. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  27. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  28. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  29. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  30. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  31. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  32. New Mexico State University
  33. New York University
  34. University of Notre Dame
  35. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  36. Ohio State University
  37. Pennsylvania State University
  38. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  39. United Kingdom Participation Group
  40. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  41. University of Arizona
  42. University of Colorado Boulder
  43. University of Oxford
  44. University of Portsmouth
  45. University of Utah
  46. University of Virginia
  47. University of Washington
  48. University of Wisconsin
  49. Vanderbilt University
  50. Yale University
  51. [DGAPA PAPIIT IN105916]
  52. [G100319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report an analysis of the metal-rich tail ([Fe/H] > -0.75) of stars located at distances from the Galactic plane up to vertical bar z vertical bar similar to 10 kpc, observed by the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE). We examine the chemistry, kinematics, and dynamics of this metal-rich sample using chemical abundances and radial velocities provided by the 14th APOGEE data release (DR14) and proper motions from the second Gaia data release (DR2). The analysis reveals three chemically different stellar populations in the [Mg/Fe] versus [Fe/H] space - a high-[Mg/Fe] and low-[Mg/Fe] populations, and a third group with intermediate [Mg/Fe] similar to +0.1 - as well as for other chemical elements. We find that they are also kinematically and dynamically distinct. The high-[Mg/Fe] population exhibits a prograde rotation which decreases down to 0 as vertical bar z(max)vertical bar increases, as well as eccentric orbits that are more bound and closer to the plane. The low-[Mg/Fe] stars are likely Sagittarius members, moving in less-bound orbits reaching larger distances from the centre and the Galactic plane. The intermediate-[Mg/Fe] stars resembles the two stellar overdensities lying about vertical bar z vertical bar similar to 5 kpc recently reported in the literature, for which a disc origin has been claimed. We report the identification of new members of these two disc-heated overdensities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available