4.7 Article

Mergers of black hole-neutron star binaries and rates of associated electromagnetic counterparts

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 486, Issue 4, Pages 5289-5309

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1147

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; equation of state; gravitational waves; gamma-ray burst: general; stars: neutron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Black hole-neutron star (BHNS) binaries are amongst promising candidates for the joint detection of electromagnetic (EM) signals with gravitational waves (GWs) and arc expected to be detected in the near future. Here we study the effect of the BHNS binary parameters on the merger ejecta properties and associated EM signals. We estimate the remnant disc and unbound ejecta masses for BH mass and spin distributions motivated from the observations of transient low-mass X-ray binaries and a specific NS equation of slate (EoS). The amount of r-process elements synthesized in BHNS mergers is estimated to be a factor of-102-104 smaller than BNS mergers, due to the smaller dynamical ejecta and merger rates for the former. We compute the EM luminosities and light curves for the early- and late-time emissions from the ultrarelativistic jet, sub-relativistic dynamical ejecta and wind, and the mildly relativistic cocoon for typical ejecta parameters. We then evaluate the low-latency EM follow-up rates of the CiW triggers in terms of the GW detection rate iVciw for current telescope sensitivities and typical BUNS binary parameters to rind that most of the EM counterparts are detectable for high BH spin, small Bll mass, and a stiffer NS EoS when NS disruption is significant. Based on the relative detection rates for given binary parameters, we rind the ease of EM follow-up to be: ejecta afterglow > cocoon afterglow greater than or similar to jet prompt > ejecta macronova > cocoon prompt > jet afterglow >> wind macronova >> wind afterglow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available