4.7 Article

Ultraluminous X-ray sources with flat-topped noise and QPO

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 486, Issue 2, Pages 2766-2779

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1027

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individuals (NGC5408 X-1, NGC6946 X-1, M82 X-1, NGC1313 X-1, IC 342 X-1)

Funding

  1. ESA member states
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-32-20214, 19-02-00432]
  3. GA CR [18-00533S]
  4. ESA
  5. USA (NASA)
  6. European Seventh Frame-work Programme (FP7/2007-2013) [312789]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analysed the X-ray power density spectra of five ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) NGC5408 X-1, NGC6946 X-1, M82 X-1, NGC1313 X-1, and IC 342 X-1 that are the only ULXs that display both flat-topped noise (FTN) and quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs). We studied the QPO frequencies, fractional root-mean-square (rms) variability, X-ray luminosity, and spectral hardness. We found that the level of FTN is anticorrelated with the QPO frequency. As the frequency of the QPO and brightness of the sources increase, their fractional variability decreases. We propose a simple interpretation using the spherization radius, viscosity time, and a-parameter as basic properties of these systems. The main physical driver of the observed variability is the mass accretion rate that varies greater than or similar to 3 between different observations of the same source. As the accretion rate decreases the spherization radius reduces and the FTN plus the QPO move towards higher frequencies, resulting in a decrease of the fractional rms variability. We also propose that in all ULXs when the accretion rate is low enough (but still super-Eddington) the QPO and FTN disappear. Assuming that the maximum X-ray luminosity depends only on the black hole (BH) mass and not on the accretion rate (not considering the effects of either the inclination of the super-Eddington disc or geometrical beaming of radiation), we estimate that all the ULXs have about similar BH masses, with the exception of M82 X-1, which might be 10 times more massive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available