4.7 Article

Phenotypic sexual dimorphism is associated with genomic signatures of resolved sexual conflict

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 2860-2871

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15115

Keywords

molecular evolution; population genetics; sexual conflict; transcriptomics

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N013948/1]
  2. H2020 European Research Council [260233, 680951]
  3. NERC [NE/N013948/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intralocus sexual conflict, where an allele benefits one sex at the expense of the other, has an important role in shaping genetic diversity of populations through balancing selection. However, the potential for mating systems to exert balancing selection through sexual conflict on the genome remains unclear. Furthermore, the nature and potential for resolution of sexual conflict across the genome has been hotly debated. To address this, we analysed de novo transcriptomes from six avian species, chosen to reflect the full range of sexual dimorphism and mating systems. Our analyses combine expression and population genomic statistics across reproductive and somatic tissue, with measures of sperm competition and promiscuity. Our results reveal that balancing selection is weakest in the gonad, consistent with the resolution of sexual conflict and evolutionary theory that phenotypic sex differences are associated with lower levels of ongoing conflict. We also demonstrate a clear link between variation in sexual conflict and levels of genetic variation across phylogenetic space in a comparative framework. Our observations suggest that this conflict is short-lived, and is resolved via the decoupling of male and female gene expression patterns, with important implications for the role of sexual selection in adaptive potential and role of dimorphism in facilitating sex-specific fitness optima.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available