4.8 Article

The Interaction of Natural Selection and GC Skew May Drive the Fast Evolution of a Sand Rat Homeobox Gene

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1473-1480

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz080

Keywords

mutation; biased gene conversion; genome evolution; protein evolution; Pdx1; homeodomain

Funding

  1. Elizabeth Hannah Jenkinson Fund
  2. Rhodes Trust
  3. Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant [RPG-2017-321]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several processes can lead to strong GC skew in localized genomic regions. In most cases, GC skew should not affect conserved amino acids because natural selection will purge deleterious alleles. However, in the gerbil subfamily of rodents, several conserved genes have undergone radical alteration in association with strong GC skew. An extreme example concerns the highly conserved homeobox gene Pdx1, which is uniquely divergent and GC rich in the sand rat Psammomys obesus and close relatives. Here, we investigate the antagonistic interplay between very rare amino acid changes driven by GC skew and the force of natural selection. Using ectopic protein expression in cell culture, pulse-chase labeling, in vitro mutagenesis, and drug treatment, we compare properties of mouse and sand rat Pdx1 proteins. We find that amino acid change driven by GC skew resulted in altered protein stability, with a significantly longer protein half-life for sand rat Pdx1. Using a reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, MG132, we find that sand rat and mouse Pdx1 are both degraded through the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. However, in vitro mutagenesis reveals this pathway operates through different amino acid residues. We propose that GC skew caused loss of a key ubiquitination site, conserved through vertebrate evolution, and that sand rat Pdx1 evolved or fixed a new ubiquitination site to compensate. Our results give molecular insight into the power of natural selection in the face of maladaptive changes driven by strong GC skew.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available