4.6 Article

Long-term subsidence in Mexico City from 2004 to 2018 revealed by five synthetic aperture radar sensors

Journal

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 30, Issue 15, Pages 1785-1801

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3347

Keywords

GEOS-ATSA; InSAR; land degradation; land subsidence; land use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anthropogenic land subsidence is an example of changes to the natural environment due to human activities and is one of the key factors in causing land degradation at a range of scales. Previous studies assessing land subsidence in the Valley of Mexico either focused on regional scale or short (noncontinuous) temporal scale. In this study, long-term land subsidence (~15 years) is mapped in Mexico City (Mexico) using two interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) methods, namely, GEOS (Geoscience and Earth Observing Systems Group)-Advance Time-series Analysis and GEOS-Small Baseline Subset. An inverse distance weighted-based integration module and maximum likelihood regression-based M estimator are introduced to further enhance these two methods. The land subsidence was continuously mapped using ENVISAT (2004-2007), ALOS-1 (2007-2011), COSMO-SkyMed (2011-2014), ALOS-2 (2014-2018), and SENTINEL-1 (2015-2017) data sets. A comparison between InSAR time-series and GPS measurement shows that the subsidence rates are consistent over 2004-2018. The subsidence map over 15 years was generated finding a maximum subsidence over 4.5 m. By comparing our InSAR results with a land use map, we find that the subsidence centre in Mexico City is mostly located in the residential regions with the consumption of groundwater contributing considerably to the local subsidence rate. A total volume of 1.20 x 10(8) m(3) of the land in Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl subsided/degraded. A continuing subsidence process limits the potential land use causing serious land degradation. Our results may be used to assist disaster reduction plans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available