Journal
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 1996-2007Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz070
Keywords
Caregiving; Ethics of aging; Labor force dynamics; Long-term care
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: Socially assistive robots (SARs) need to be studied from older adults' perspective, given their predicted future ubiquity in aged-care settings. Current ethical discourses on SARs in aged care are uninformed by primary stakeholders' ethical perceptions. This study reports on what community-dwelling older adults in Flanders, Belgium, perceive as ethical issues of SARs in aged care. Methods: Constructivist grounded theory guided the study of 9 focus groups of 59 community-dwelling older adults (70+ years) in Flanders, Belgium. An open-ended topic guide and a modified Alice Cares documentary focused discussions. The Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) guided data analysis. Results: Data revealed older adults' multidimensional perceptions on the ethics of SARs which were structured along three sections: (a) SARs as components of a techno-societal evolution, (b) SARs' embeddedness in aged-care dynamics, (c) SARs as embodiments of ethical considerations. Discussion: Perceptions sociohistorically contextualize the ethics of SAR use by older adults' views on societal, organizational, and relational contexts in which aged care takes place. These contexts need to inform the ethical criteria for the design, development, and use of SARs. Focusing on older adults' ethical perceptions creates normativity in place, viewing participants as moral subjects.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available