4.6 Article

Higher clinical suspicion is needed for prompt diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma in young patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 159, Issue 1, Pages 317-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.095

Keywords

esophageal cancer; young patients; esophageal adenocarcinoma; screening guidelines

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  2. American Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Esophageal cancer is considered a disease of the elderly. Although the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in young patients is increasing, current guidelines for endoscopic evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus include age as a cutoff. There is a paucity of data on the presentation and treatment of esophageal cancer in young patients. Most studies are limited by small sample sizes, and conflicting findings are reported regarding delayed diagnosis and survival compared with older patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were divided into quartiles by age (18-57, 58-65, 66-74, 75+ years) for comparison. Clinicopathologic and treatment factors were compared between groups. Results: A total of 101,596 patients were identified with esophageal cancer. The youngest patient group (18-57 years) had the highest rate of metastatic disease (34%). No difference in tumor differentiation was observed between age groups. Younger patient groups were more likely to undergo treatment despite advanced stage at diagnosis. Overall 5-year survival was better for younger patients with local disease, but the difference was less pronounced in locoregional and metastatic cases. Conclusions: In this study, young patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at diagnosis. Advanced stage in young patients may reflect the need for more aggressive clinical evaluation in high-risk young patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available