4.7 Article

Lifestyle, Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c, and Survival Among Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 16, Pages 2049-2058

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.067

Keywords

diabetes; guideline-directed medical therapy; hemoglobin A1c; lifestyle; optimal medical therapy; secondary prevention; stable ischemic heart disease

Funding

  1. Cooperative Studies Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Merck
  4. Pfizer
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Fujisawa
  7. Kos Pharmaceuticals
  8. Datascope
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Key Pharmaceutical
  11. Sanofi
  12. First Horizon
  13. GE Healthcare
  14. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  15. Merck Canada
  16. Amgen
  17. Boehringer Ingelheim
  18. Abbott Vascular
  19. Bayer
  20. Amarin
  21. Abbvie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The importance of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (A1c) control as part of comprehensive risk factor management in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is controversial. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether a greater number of controlled risk factors at 1 year, including A1c, affects survival in patients with DM and SIHD. METHODS Of 690 patients with DM followed in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial, 592 (86%) had complete ascertainment of 7 pre-specified risk factors at baseline and after 1 year: systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, nonsmoking, physical activity, diet adherence, body mass index, and A1c. The primary outcome measure was mortality beyond 1 year after randomization. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 7.0 +/- 4.2 years beyond 1 year after randomization, 186 subjects died (31.4% overall, 4.5%/year). The greater the number of risk factors controlled at 1 year, the higher the probability of survival (unadjusted log rank p = 0.002). Compared with 0 to 1 controlled risk factors, attaining 3 to 7 goals predicted progressively lower mortality (hazard ratio for control of 6 or 7 risk factors was 0.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.40). Importantly, only 10.3% of subjects achieved control of 6 or 7 risk factors. In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of improved survival were no smoking, regular physical activity, dietary adherence, and A1c < 7%. CONCLUSIONS In this high-risk subset of SIHD patients with DM, the number of controlled risk factors, particularly lifestyle behaviors and A1c, were associated with improved survival. (C) 2019 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available