4.8 Article

Vapor-Phase Strategy to Pillaring of Two-Dimensional Zeolite

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 22, Pages 8712-8716

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b03479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-1706059]
  3. Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001004]
  4. Maryland NanoCenter and its NispLab
  5. NSF as an MRSEC Shared Experimental Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional (2D) layered zeolites are new forms of 3D zeolite frameworks. They can be pillared to form more open porous structures with increased access for reactants that are too big for the micropores of zeolites. The current pillaring procedure, however, requires intercalation of pillaring precursors by dispersing 2D zeolite in an alkoxide liquid and hydrolizing entrapped alkoxide to form inorganic oxide pillars in an aqueous alkaline solution. Both steps use excess solvents, generate significant waste, and require multiple synthesis and separation steps. Here we report a vapor-phase pillarization (VPP) process to produce pillared zeolites from 2D layered zeolite structures. The VPP process has similar to 100% efficiency of alkoxide usage in the intercalation step, requires less (and, in some cases, zero) water addition in the hydrolysis step, does not require separation for product recovery, and generates no liquid waste. Furthermore, synthesis of pillared zeolites via the VPP process can be accomplished within a single apparatus with one-time operation. The pillared zeolite prepared by the VPP method preserved the zeolitic layered structure as well as acidity and showed enhancement in catalytic alkylation of mesitylene with benzyl alcohol compared to 2D layered zeolite without pillarization treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available