4.8 Article

Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticle-Assisted Cryopreservation of Red Blood Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 19, Pages 7789-7796

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00992

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sandia National Laboratory Laboratory-Directed Research and Development Program
  2. Department of Energy Office of Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DENA-0003525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of hybrid nanomaterials mimicking antifreeze proteins that can modulate/inhibit the growth of ice crystals for cell/tissue cryopreservation has attracted increasing interests. Herein, we describe the first utilization of zirconium (Zr)-based metal-organic framework (MOF) nanoparticles (NPs) with well-defined surface chemistries for the cryopreservation of red blood cells (RBCs) without the need of any (toxic) organic solvents. Distinguishing features of this cryoprotective approach include the exceptional water stability, low hemolytic activity, and the long periodic arrangement of organic linkers on the surface of MOF NPs, which, provide a precise spacing of hydrogen donors to recognize and match the ice crystal planes. Five kinds of Zr-based MOF NPs, with different pore size, surface chemistry, and framework topologies, were used for the cryoprotection of RBCs. A splat assay confirmed that MOF NPs not only exhibited ice recrystallization inhibition activities but also acted as a catalyst to accelerate the melting of ice crystals. The human RBC cryopreservation tests displayed RBC recoveries of up to similar to 40%, which is higher than that obtained via commonly used hydroxyethyl starch polymers. This cryopreservation approach will inspire the design and utilization of MOF-derived nanoarchitectures for the effective cryopreservation of various cell types as well as tissue samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available