4.2 Article

HOME RANGE OF A LARGE FOREST EAGLE IN A SUBURBAN LANDSCAPE: CROWNED EAGLES (STEPHANOAETUS CORONATUS) IN THE DURBAN METROPOLITAN OPEN SPACE SYSTEM, SOUTH AFRICA

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 180-188

Publisher

RAPTOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
DOI: 10.3356/JRR-17-83

Keywords

Crowned Eagle; Stephanoaetus coronatus; Africa; habitat selection; raptor; urban forests; urban wildlife; utilization distribution

Categories

Funding

  1. eThekwini Municipality-University of KwaZulu-Natal KZN Sandstone Sourveld Research Partnership
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. South African Falconry Association, Free State Falconry Club
  4. eThekwini Municipality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apex predators are sensitive to human disturbance and persecution, often becoming the first losses in a declining urban wildlife community. A population of Crowned Eagles (Stephanoaetus coronatus) within eThekwini municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, persists in a green space network called the Durban Metropolitan Open Space System (DMOSS). We used GPS-UHF telemetry to investigate the home range and habitat use of five breeding adult Crowned Eagles for 1 yr. We documented a mean annual home range for four birds of 13 km(2) (Minimum Convex Polygon [MCP] 100%), or 6.3 km(2) (Kernel Density Estimator [KDE], bandwith H-LSCV 95%), equating to small home ranges for this large eagle, compared with other large eagles. Habitat use within home ranges and correlation with DMOSS area underscored the importance of retaining forest patches in the urban mosaic landscape to encourage the persistence of this large raptor. Our study highlighted the importance of planning green space in future city expansion and land development. The spatial and habitat associations of Crowned Eagles may be used to inform urban planners who wish to support biodiverse communities that include apex predators in an urban landscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available