4.4 Article

Exploring the hadron resonance gas phase on the QCD phase diagram

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab1a6b

Keywords

hadron resonance gas model; QCD phase diagram; susceptibility; hadronic phase boundary

Funding

  1. AGH UST within Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) [11.11.220.01/1]
  2. National Science Centre grant [2015/17/B/ST2/00101]
  3. DST J C Bose fellowship
  4. DAE, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lattice computations of strongly interacting matter at finite temperature T and baryon chemical potential mu(B) suggest that the QCD thermodynamics deep in the hadronic phase can be adequately modeled by an ideal hadron resonance gas (I-HRG). However, it is not clear where on the (mu(B), T) plane this description breaks down, making it essential to account for hadronic interactions and change in the nature of the degrees of freedom. We have studied several thermodynamic functions within the I-HRG model and try to identify the region of the QCD phase diagram where it becomes essential to include non-ideal effects into the I-HRG model. We work with only those thermodynamic quantities that show a monotonic rise with T and mu(B) in I-HRG. Their high temperature limiting values where QCD becomes simply a Stefan- Boltzmann (SB) gas of massless quarks and gluons is known. The rise of these quantities in I-HRG beyond the corresponding SB limit values indicate the need to include interactions into I-HRG to study QCD thermodynamics. This works as a guiding principle on the QCD phase diagram where interacting HRGs can take over from I-HRG. For mu(B)/T <= 2, chi(Q)(2) shoots the SB limit at the smallest T, while for higher values of mu(B)/T, C-BS = -3 chi(BS)(11)/chi(S)(2) takes over. We further comment on the relative positions between the freeze-out curve obtained by thermal fits to the measured hadron yields and the obtained line where the I-HRG overshoots the SB limit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available