4.6 Article

LC-QQQ-MS routine analysis method for new biomarker quantification in plasma aimed at early chronic kidney disease diagnosis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.02.042

Keywords

Metabolomics; Biomarker; Chronic kidney disease; LC-QQQ-MS routine analysis

Funding

  1. SGIker of UPV/EHU
  2. ERDF
  3. ESF
  4. Basque Government, Research Groups of the Basque University System [IT338-10]
  5. Basque Government (Department of Education, Language Policy and Culture) [PRE_2013_1_899, EP_2016_1_0003]
  6. UPV/EHU [DOCREC18/27]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) is currently assessed using glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is calculated from different equations based on serum creatinine concentration. However, serum creatinine is affected by several factors and is not reliable enough for the diagnosis of CKD, especially at early stages. Recent targeted and untargeted metabolomics studies found 7 new potential biomarkers that could be useful for early pediatric chronic kidney disease diagnosis. Thus, a new LC-QQQ-MS analytical method has been developed and validated aimed at routine analysis of these 7 potential biomarkers: NG,NG'-dimethyl-L-arginine di(p-hydroxyazobenzene-p'-sulfonate) (SDMA), S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM), n-butyryl-L-carnitine (nC4), iso-butyryl-L-carnitine (iC4), citrulline (CIT), creatinine (CNN) and D-erytro-sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), in addition to creatinine, the classical biomarker for CKD diagnosis. Then, this analytical method has been used for the quantification of plasma samples from a heterogeneous group of CKD pediatric patients and a control pediatric population. Data analysis of these results showed that it is possible to differentiate between CKD and control populations based on the metabolite concentration in plasma. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available