4.7 Article

Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 263, Issue 4, Pages 751-760

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001193

Keywords

chemoradiotherapy; diagnostic imaging; rectal neoplasm; rectal surgery; risk factors

Categories

Funding

  1. Pelican Cancer Foundation
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  3. Royal Marsden Hospital National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Yorkshire Cancer Research
  5. Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Leeds
  6. Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
  7. Academy of Medical Sciences
  8. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL7-West] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-02-004, ACF-2006-02-002, NF-SI-0515-10045] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:This study aimed to validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging classification that preoperatively assessed the relationship between tumor and the low rectal cancer surgical resection plane (mrLRP).Background:Low rectal cancer oncological outcomes remain a global challenge, evidenced by high pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM) rates and unacceptable variations in permanent colostomies.Methods:Between 2008 and 2012, a prospective, observational, multicenter study (MERCURY II) recruited 279 patients with adenocarcinoma 6cm or less from the anal verge. MRI assessed the following: mrLRP safe or unsafe, venous invasion (mrEMVI), depth of spread, node status, tumor height, and tumor quadrant. MRI-based treatment recommendations were compared against final management and pCRM outcomes.Results:Overall pCRM involvement was 9.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9-12.3], significantly lower than previously reported rates of 30%. Patients with no adverse MRI features and a safe mrLRP underwent sphincter-preserving surgery without preoperative radiotherapy, resulting in a 1.6% pCRM rate. The pCRM rate increased 5-fold for an unsafe compared with safe preoperative mrLRP [odds ratio (OR) = 5.5; 95% CI, 2.3-13.3)]. Posttreatment MRI reassessment indicated a safe ymrLRP in 33 of 113 (29.2%), none of whom had ypCRM involvement. In contrast, persistent unsafe ymrLRP posttherapy resulted in 17.5% ypCRM involvement. Further independent MRI assessed risk factors were EMVI (OR = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5-9.6), tumors less than 4.0cm from the anal verge (OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.8), and anterior tumors (OR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-6.8).Conclusions:The study validated MRI low rectal plane assessment, reducing pCRM involvement and avoiding overtreatment through selective preoperative therapy and rationalized use of permanent colostomy. It also highlights the importance of posttreatment restaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available