4.5 Article

Goals-of-Care Decisions by Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer: Missed Clinician Opportunities for Facilitating Shared Decision-Making

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 216-223

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.05.002

Keywords

Decision-making; cancer; palliative care; communication

Funding

  1. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University Director's Fund
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [K12 HD055884]
  3. American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar grant [MRSG 14-058-01-PCSM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer often face complex, preference-sensitive decisions. How clinicians and patients engage in shared decision-making during goals-of-care discussions is not well understood. Objective. The objective of this study was to explore decision-making by patients and clinicians during inpatient goals-ofcare discussions. Methods. This is a qualitative study of audio-recorded goals-of-care discussions between hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and their clinicians. Grounded theory was used to analyze transcripts. Results. Sixty-two patients participated in goals-of-care discussions with 51 unique clinicians. Nearly half of patients (n = 30) were female and their mean age was 60.1 years (SD = 12.7). A palliative care attending or fellow was present in 58 of the 62 discussions. Decisions centered on three topics: 1) disease-modifying treatments; 2) hospice; and 3) code status. Clinicians' approach to decision-making included the following stages: information exchange,'' deliberation,'' making a patient-centered recommendation,'' and wrap-up: decisional status.'' Successful completion of each stage varied by the type of decision. When discussing code status, clinicians missed opportunities to engage patients in information exchange and to wrap up decisional status. By contrast, clinicians discussing disease-modifying treatments and hospice failed to integrate patient preferences. Clinicians also missed opportunities to make patient-centered recommendations when discussing treatment decisions. Conclusion. Clinicians missed opportunities to facilitate shared decision-making regarding goals of care, and these missed opportunities differed by type of decision being discussed. Opportunities for clinician communication training include engagement in collaborative deliberation with patients and making patient-centered recommendations in situations of high medical uncertainty. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available