4.4 Article

An arterially perfused brainstem preparation of guinea pig to study central mechanisms of airway defense

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages 49-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.004

Keywords

Respiratory rhythm; Respiratory pattern; Cough; Airway defense; Brainstem; Hering-Breuer reflex; Pneumotaxic center

Funding

  1. Australian Research council (ARC) [FT120100953]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT120100953] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The perfused working heart brainstem preparation of rodents has become a widely used tool to study brainstem function. Here, we adapt this experimental technique for newborn guinea pigs (postnatal day 7-14) to develop a tool that enables investigation of airway defense mechanisms not observed in other rodents. The perfused guinea pig brainstem preparation generates a stable eupnea-like motor pattern recorded from the phrenic, recurrent laryngeal and intercostal nerves and basic cardio-respiratory reflexes, including the arterial chemoreceptor, the baroreceptor reflex. In addition a fictive laryngeal cough reflex can be reliably elicited after mechanical stimulation of the trachea. Single unit recordings within the ponto-medullary respiratory column show robust central respiratory neuronal activity. Additionally, as in other species ponto-medullary transection of the brainstem produces apneusis. The latter suggests that the preparation fully preserves ponto-medullary synaptic connectivity that is required for eupnea-like respiratory rhythm and pattern formation and the mediation of various cardio-respiratory reflexes. We conclude that this novel research tool provides an alternative to established rat and mouse preparations and may become a experimental tool for the investigation of central mechanisms that mediate laryngeal cough.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available