4.7 Article

The Large-Scale Organization of Gestures and Words in the Middle Temporal Gyrus

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 30, Pages 5966-5974

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2668-18.2019

Keywords

emblems; gestures; organization; pantomimes; speech

Categories

Funding

  1. Provincia Autonoma di Trento
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto
  3. German Research Foundation Heisenberg-Professorship [Li 2840/2-1]
  4. Research Council Starting Grant (Project THEMPO) [758473]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The middle temporal gyrus (MTG) has been shown to be recruited during the processing of words, but also during the observation of actions. Here we investigated how information related to words and gestures is organized along the MTG. To this aim, we measured the BOLD response in the MTG to video clips of gestures and spoken words in 17 healthy human adults (male and female). Gestures consisted of videos of an actress performing object-use pantomimes (iconic representations of object-directed actions; e.g., playing guitar), emblems (conventional gestures, e.g., thumb up), and meaningless gestures. Word stimuli (verbs, nouns) consisted of video clips of the same actress pronouncing words. We found a stronger response to meaningful compared with meaningless gestures along the whole left and large portions of the right MTG. Importantly, we observed a gradient, with posterior regions responding more strongly to gestures (pantomimes and emblems) than words and anterior regions showing a stronger response to words than gestures. In an intermediate region in the left hemisphere, the response was significantly higher to words and emblems (i.e., items with a greater arbitrariness of the sign-to-meaning mapping) than to pantomimes. These results show that the large-scale organization of information in the MTG is driven by the input modality and may also reflect the arbitrariness of the relationship between sign and meaning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available