4.5 Article

Inhibition of soluble TNFα prevents adverse atrial remodeling and atrial arrhythmia susceptibility induced in mice by endurance exercise

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 165-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.01.012

Keywords

Exercise; Heart; Atrial fibrillation; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Inflammation

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-83453, MOP-119339, MOP 125950]
  2. Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Biology
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intense endurance exercise is linked to atrial fibrillation (AF). We established previously that interventions that simultaneously interfere with TNF alpha signaling, mediated via both the enzymatically liberated soluble and membrane-bound forms of TNF alpha, prevent atrial remodeling and AF vulnerability in exercised mice. To investigate which signaling modality underlies this protection, we treated exercised mice with XPRO (R) 1595, a selective dominant-negative inhibitor of solTNF alpha. In male CD1 mice, 6 weeks of intense swim exercise induced reductions in heart rate, increased cardiac vagal tone, left ventricular (LV) dilation and enhanced LV function. By contrast, exercise induced hypertrophy, fibrosis, and increased inflammatory cell infiltrates in atria, and these changes were associated with increased AF susceptibility in isolated atria as well as mice, with and without parasympathetic nerve blockade. Although XPRO treatment had no effect on the beneficial physiological changes induced by exercise, it protected against adverse atrial changes as well as AF susceptibility. Our results establish that soluble TNF alpha is required for exercise-induced increases in AF vulnerability, which is linked to fibrosis, inflammation, and enlargement of the atria, but largely independent of changes in vagal tone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available