4.5 Article

Parameter identification of ship motion model based on multi-innovation methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 162-184

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-019-00639-y

Keywords

Ship response model; Parameter identification; Multi-innovation method; Nomoto model; Forgetting factor

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province Project [2015CFA111]
  2. Project of Ministry of Transport, PRC [2015326548030]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632923]
  4. Double First-rate Project of WUT(Wuhan university of Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In consideration of the defects of traditional least squares and extended Kalman filtering methods that are used for parameter identification of ship response model, i.e., low precision and converge rate, multi-innovation least squares and improved multi-innovation extended Kalman filtering are proposed in this paper, respectively. Specifically, a forgetting factor is introduced to reduce the cumulative impact of past interference in multi-innovation extended Kalman filtering, and relevant bounded convergence of the improved method has been analyzed theoretically. Based on 10./10., 20. /20. and 30. /30. zigzag tests on a real experiment platform and simulations with KVLCC2 ship model, comparisons on identification precision and convergence rate between the proposed multi-innovation identification methods and traditional methods are conducted. Meanwhile, comparisons between the multi-innovation least squares and the improved multi-innovation extended Kalman filtering are also carried out. The simulation and actual experiment results indicate that both the identification accuracy and convergence rate of the proposed improved multi-innovation extend Kalman filtering method are higher than those of the traditional identification methods and the multi-innovation least squares method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available