4.5 Article

Core loss of ultra-rapidly annealed Fe-rich nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 476, Issue -, Pages 142-148

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.053

Keywords

Rapid annealing; Core loss; Anomaly factor; HiB-nanoperm; Soft magnetic materials; Nanocrystalline

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultra-rapidly annealed (heating rate > 10(4) K/s, annealing time < 1 s) Fe-rich nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials with a nominal composition of Fe100-xBx and Fe87-yB13My where x = 12, 13, 14, y = 1, 2 and M = Cu, Ni (HiB-Nanoperm) have recently been demonstrated with a saturation magnetic polarization (J(s)) up to 1.92 T and a low coercivity (H-c) of less than 8 A/m. In this study the AC core loss (P-cm) is estimated for HiB-Nanoperm at 50, 400 and 1000 Hz and is compared with existing amorphous, nanocrystalline and conventionally crystalline (Fe-Si) materials. The P-cm of HiB-Nanoperm at 1.5 T, 50 Hz is demonstrated to be 5-15% that of Fe-3 wt% Si. In specific, Fe86B13Cu1 displays losses that are 30% that of Fe-6.5 wt% Si steel while also possessing a 5% larger J(s). For maximum magnetic polarization (J(m)) values greater than 1.5 T this same composition also exhibits some of the lowest core losses seen from all Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys across the frequencies tested in this study. Core loss separation and an estimation of the anomaly factor (eta) for selected HiB-Nanoperm alloys is also undertaken and compared with a Fe-based amorphous alloy. The eta of HiB-Nanoperm is seen to be lower than that of Fe-based amorphous alloy and is also observed to be positively correlated with saturation magnetostriction. The low core loss of HiB-Nanoperm is attributed to a reduced anomalous loss which may be brought about by the moderate magnetostriction of this alloy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available