4.5 Article

Unraveling the origin of training in granular Co-CoO exchange bias systems with buried antiferromagnetic constituents

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 478, Issue -, Pages 170-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.104

Keywords

Magnetic properties of interfaces; Magnetic anisotropy; Micromagnetic simulations; Exchange interactions: magnetically ordered materials; Hysteresis in magnetism

Funding

  1. Brazilian Foundation CNPq [402013/2016-6, 104289/2018-0]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017-SGR-292]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [665919]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Training is a common effect in exchange bias systems and accounts for the decrease of the exchange bias loop shift and coercivity with consecutively measured hysteresis loops until steady values. This is an ageing-like phenomenon that is related to the metastable state of the ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic interface after field cooling. However, its origin still remains intriguing and not univoquely established. Here, by micromagnetic simulations considering discrete non-interacting antiferromagnetic grains embedded in a ferromagnetic matrix, it is demonstrated that the origin of training in granular Co-CoO exchange bias systems prepared by 0 ion implantation into Co thin films is linked to the perpendicular anisotropy of rotatable interface uncompensated spins. The simulations are compared to experimental data as reported in Physical Review B 89 (2014) 144407. The out-of-plane nature of the rotatable anisotropy of the system is also responsible for the magnetic reversal asymmetry between the first and the second magnetic reversals, evidencing the interconnection between training and magnetization reversal, suggesting that training effect and magnetization reversal asymmetry are ultimately interconnected through perpendicular anisotropy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available