4.7 Article

Poly(D, L-Lactic Acid) (PDLLA) Biodegradable and Biocompatible Polymer Optical Fiber

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 9, Pages 1916-1923

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2019.2895220

Keywords

Biodegradable materials; optical polymers; plastic optical fiber

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G048915N, G0F6218N, 30467715]
  2. FWO project [FWOKN273]
  3. Polish National Science Centre through project HARMONIA [YUMO-2013/10/M/ST3/00708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate that commercially available poly(D, L-lactic acid) (PDLLA) is a suitable material for the fabrication of biodegradable optical fibers with a standard heat drawing process. To do so we report on the chemical and optical characterization of the material. We address the influence of the polymer processing on the molecular weight and thermal properties of the polymer following the preparation of the polymer preforms and the fiber optic drawing process. We show that cutback measurements of the first optical fibers drawn fromPDLLA return an attenuation coefficient as low as 0.11 dB/cm at 772 nm, which is the lowest loss reported this far for optical fibers drawn from bio-resorbable material. We also report on the dispersion characteristics of PDLLA, and we find that the thermo-optic coefficient is in the range of -10-4 degrees C-1. Finally, we studied the degradation of PDLLA fibers in vitro, revealing that fibers with the largest diameter of 600 mu m degrade faster than those with smaller diameters of 300 and 200 mu m and feature more than 84% molecular weight loss over a period of 3 months. The evolution of the optical loss of the fibers as a function of time during immersion in phosphate-buffered saline indicates that these devices are potential candidates for use in photodynamic therapy-like application scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available