4.2 Article

Comprehensive and Global Approach of Soft-Tissue Deformities in Craniofacial Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Journal

ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 190-194

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000494

Keywords

neurofibromatosis; craniofacial; surgical treatment; soft-tissue

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To present a single-institution experience in the comprehensive and global soft-tissue surgical approach of patients with craniofacial neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with craniofacial NF-1 (n = 20) who underwent craniofacial soft-tissue reconstruction between 1993 and 2014 was conducted. Surgical treatment was individualized according to age, functional and/or aesthetic impairment, neurofibroma types, anatomical location, size, and patient/family and surgical team preferences, regardless of previously published compartmental grading systems. The surgical results were classified based on 2 previously published outcome rating scales (craniofacial symmetry improvement and need for additional surgery). Results: All patients underwent en bloc translesional surgical excisions, 12 facial suspension, 3 eyebrow suspension, 2 ear suspension, 9 lateral canthopexy, 5 horizontal shortening of the tarsus of lower eyelid, and 1 horizontal shortening of the tarsus of upper eyelid. The degree of craniofacial symmetry improvement was considered mostly satisfactory (75%), and the overall rate of surgical results ranked according to the need for additional surgery was 2.4 +/- 0.50, with variations according to the spectrum of soft-tissue involvement. Conclusions: According to the experience and surgical outcomes presented in this study, the soft-tissue surgical approach of the craniofacial NF-1 should be global, comprehensive, and individualized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available