4.5 Article

Perioperative Complications and Outcomes after Intestinal Autotransplantation for Neoplasms Involving the Superior Mesenteric Artery

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 650-658

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04204-1

Keywords

Intestinal autotransplantation; Neoplasms; SMA resection; Clinical outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Intestinal autotransplantation (IATx) is a novel surgical technique for neoplasms arising from the pancreas, duodenum, mesentery, or retroperitoneum with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The value of this aggressive procedure remains to be defined. We describe its surgical indications, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes after IATx. Methods Fifteen patients aged 20 to 67 years (mean 44.9 years) underwent IATx in our program from January 2011 to January 2018. In all patients, selection and harvesting of a healthy bowel autograft were initially carried out, and an extended en bloc resection of neoplasms was performed afterward. Results Of the 15 patients, there was one early death from a pancreatic leak and two late deaths either from disease recurrence or sudden cardiac arrest. Ten patients developed 23 postoperative complications. Of these, one patient lost his bowel autograft due to arterial thrombosis 48 h later. Delayed gastric emptying, pleural effusions, pancreatic fistula, and relaparotomy were the most common complications. In our series, four of nine patients with invasive malignant neoplasms had evidence of disease recurrence at 13, 13, 16, and 18 months after IATx. At a median follow-up of 29.9 months, 11 patients undergoing successful IATx remained alive with a well-functioning bowel graft. Conclusion Our results indicate that IATx is technically feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. This procedure should be considered in selected patients presenting with locally invasive neoplasms involving the SMA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available