4.7 Article

Shock-turbulence interactions at high turbulence intensities

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 870, Issue -, Pages 813-847

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.248

Keywords

compressible turbulence; shock waves; turbulence simulation

Funding

  1. NSF [OCI-1054966]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0443, FA9550-17-1-0107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shock-turbulence interactions are investigated using well-resolved direct numerical simulations (DNS) and analysis at a range of Reynolds, mean and turbulent Mach numbers (R-lambda, M and M-t, respectively). The simulations are shock and turbulence resolving with R-lambda up to 65, M-t up to 0.54 and M up to 1.4. The focus is on the effect of strong turbulence on the jumps of mean thermodynamic variables across the shock, the shock structure and the amplification of turbulence as it moves through the shock. Theoretical results under the so-called quasi-equilibrium (QE) assumption provide explicit laws for a number of statistics of interests which are in agreement with the new DNS data presented here as well as all the data available in the literature. While in previous studies turbulence was found to weaken jumps, it is shown here that stronger jumps are also observed depending on the regime of the interaction. Statistics of the dilatation at the shock are also investigated and found to be well represented by QE for weak turbulence but saturate at high turbulence intensities with a Reynolds number dependence also captured by the analysis. Finally, amplification factors are found to present a universal behaviour with two limiting asymptotic regimes governed by (M - 1) and K = M-t/R-lambda(1/2) (M - 1), for weak and strong turbulence, respectively. Effect of anisotropy in the incoming flow is also assessed by utilizing two different forcing mechanisms to generate turbulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available