4.7 Article

Deeper roots associated with cooler canopies, higher normalized difference vegetation index, and greater yield in three wheat populations grown on stored soil water

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 70, Issue 18, Pages 4963-4974

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz232

Keywords

Canopy temperature; core-break; deep root; drought adaptation; NDVI; thermal imaging; wheat

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) via the 'Indo-Australian project on root and establishment traits for greater water use efficiency in wheat - Phase 2' project [CIM/2006/071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simple and repeatable methods are needed to select for deep roots under field conditions. A large-scale field experiment was conducted to assess the association between canopy temperature (CT) measured by airborne thermography and rooting depth determined by the core-break method. Three wheat populations, C306xWestonia (CW), HartogxDrysdale (HD), and SundorxSonglen (SS), were grown on stored soil water in NSW Australia in 2017 (n=196-252). Cool and warm CT extremes ('tails') were cored after harvest (13-32% of each population). Rooting depth was significantly correlated with CT at late flowering (r=-0.25, -0.52, and -0.23 for CW, HD, and SS, respectively, P<0.05 hereafter), with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at early grain filling (r=0.30-0.39), and with canopy height (r=0.23-0.48). The cool tails showed significantly deeper roots than the respective warm tails by 8.1 cm and 6.2 cm in CW and HD, and correspondingly, greater yields by an average 19% and 7%, respectively. This study highlighted that CT measured rapidly by airborne thermography or NDVI at early grain filling could be used to guide selection of lines with deeper roots to increase wheat yields. The remote measurement methods in this study were repeatable and high throughput, making them well suited to use in breeding programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available