4.7 Article

ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1386-1422

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235

Keywords

colorectal cancer; ESMO; consensus; clinical practice guidelines

Categories

Funding

  1. European Society for Medical Oncology central funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly over the last 20 years. These ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available