4.6 Article

Variability of Faecal Calprotectin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: An Observational Case-control Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages 1372-1379

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz069

Keywords

Faecal calprotectin; variability; inflammatory bowel disease

Funding

  1. Fonds Erasme for Medical Research
  2. Belgian National Fund of Scientific Research [FNRS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Several factors have been reported to affect faecal calprotectin [FC] values, and significant variation in FC concentrations has been observed in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients. We aimed to evaluate FC variability in IBD patients, and to assess the robustness of a single stool punch. Methods: This is a single-centre observational case-control study. Disease activity was assessed using endoscopic and clinical activity scores, as well as C-reactive protein levels. Stool samples were collected twice within a 1 to 6 days interval, and FC was measured on punches and homogenates by fluorometric enzyme immunocapture assay. Results: In all, 260 stool samples were collected from 120 patients. Intrastool variability was low, with an intraclass correlation coefficient for single measures between three punches from a single stool sample of 0.91, and median coefficient of variation [CV] of 17%. CV of two stool samples a few days apart [intra-individual variability] were significantly higher [p <0.01] with median CV of 36%. FC standard deviations correlated with mean FC levels either for intrastool or for intra-individual variability, with a Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation of 0.85 and 0.78, respectively [p <0.01]. Disease type, location, activity, and FC levels did not influence variability. Conclusions: A single stool punch is reliable for FC measurement, considering that intrastool variability is low. Intra-individual variability a few days apart is significantly higher. Therefore, decision-making strategies based on single measurements should consider this variability, to determine the minimum optimal variation to be achieved, rather than a cut-off, especially in high FC levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available