4.7 Article

Adversarial uncertainty quantification in physics-informed neural networks

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 394, Issue -, Pages 136-152

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.027

Keywords

Variational inference; Generative adversarial networks; Probabilistic deep learning; Probabilistic scientific computing; Data-driven modeling

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy under the Advanced Scientific Computing Research program [DE-SC0019116]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under the Physics of Artificial Intelligence program [HR00111890034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a deep learning framework for quantifying and propagating uncertainty in systems governed by non-linear differential equations using physics-informed neural networks. Specifically, we employ latent variable models to construct probabilistic representations for the system states, and put forth an adversarial inference procedure for training them on data, while constraining their predictions to satisfy given physical laws expressed by partial differential equations. Such physics-informed constraints provide a regularization mechanism for effectively training deep generative models as surrogates of physical systems in which the cost of data acquisition is high, and training data-sets are typically small. This provides a flexible framework for characterizing uncertainty in the outputs of physical systems due to randomness in their inputs or noise in their observations that entirely bypasses the need for repeatedly sampling expensive experiments or numerical simulators. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through a series of examples involving uncertainty propagation in non-linear conservation laws, and the discovery of constitutive laws for flow through porous media directly from noisy data. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available