4.6 Article

Stress-Strain Relation of FRP-Confined Predamaged Concrete Prisms with Square Sections of Different Corner Radii Subjected to Monotonic Axial Compression

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000921

Keywords

Confinement; Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) jacketing; Stress-strain model; Corner radius; Repairing; Concrete structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51622808, 51578337, 51578338, 51778371]
  2. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JCYJ20170817100253542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the behavior of predamaged concrete prisms that were strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets. Tests were conducted on 46 concrete columns involving variations of corner radius ratios, damage levels, and confinement pressure. This paper investigates the effect of corner radii on the main parameters of the stress-strain curve for FRP-strengthened predamaged specimens, such as compressive strength, strain capacity, and initial elastic modulus. The test results demonstrated that the efficiency of repairing damaged columns greatly depends on the corner radius ratio. The strength gains after FRP strengthening decrease as the corner radius ratio reduces. Furthermore, this paper extends a well-established stress-strain model originally proposed for FRP-confined predamaged circular concrete columns to square columns. More accurate expressions for the strength, deformation capacity, and stress-strain relationship were developed considering both the corner radius ratio and predamaged level. The proposed model was verified by test results and can predict the stress-strain behavior of a FRP-confined predamaged concrete column with good accuracy. (C) 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available