4.6 Article

Efficacy of Er:YAG laser on periodontitis as an adjunctive non-surgical treatment: A split-mouth randomized controlled study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 539-547

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13107

Keywords

Er; YAG laser; non-surgical therapy; periodontitis; randomized controlled trial; scaling and root planing

Funding

  1. Beijing Science and Technology Program Fund [Z151100004015100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81500854, 81670989]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To evaluate the adjunctive efficacy of Er:YAG laser use with mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) for non-surgical treatment of periodontitis. Materials and Methods In a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial, 27 patients were recruited. Using a split-mouth design, two quadrants were randomly allocated into either a test group or a control group. The test quadrants received Er:YAG laser (ERL; 100 mJ/pulse; 15 Hz to hard tissue and 50 mJ/pulse; 30 Hz to soft tissue) plus SRP treatment, while the control quadrants received SRP only. We evaluated periodontal indexes, including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding index (BI), and plaque index (PLI) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Results The PD and CAL means in the ERL + SRP group were significantly lower than those in the SRP group at 3-month follow-up (PD: 2.98 +/- 0.38 mm vs. 3.09 +/- 0.35 mm; CAL: 4.51 +/- 0.69 mm vs. 4.72 +/- 0.67 mm) and 6-month follow-up (PD: 2.91 +/- 0.31 mm vs. 3.02 +/- 0.30 mm; CAL: 4.52 +/- 0.65 mm vs. 4.72 +/- 0.66 mm; p = 0.03 for both PD and CAL). There were no significant differences in BI and PLI between two groups. Conclusions The Er:YAG laser treatment combined with conventional SRP significantly improved PD and CAL compared to SRP therapy alone; however, these differences were very small and, as a result, the adjunctive effect of Er:YAG laser is likely to be minimal clinically important.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available