4.7 Article

A randomized, double-blind phase II study evaluating cediranib versus cediranib and saracatinib in patients with relapsed metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (COSAK)

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 880-886

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw014

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; biomarker; SRC; VEGF

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. AstraZeneca [2009-018014-20]
  3. CaCTUS, Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2015-19-005, 09/91/21] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SRC inhibition may help overcome resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cancer. This hypothesis was tested in a randomized phase II study. Results showed saracatinib (SRC inhibitor) did not increase the efficacy of a VEGF-targeted therapy (cediranib) in this setting. Biomarker analysis did not identify consistent predictive biomarkers.Preclinical work suggests SRC proteins have a role in the development of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (mRCC). This hypothesis was tested in this trial using the SRC inhibitor saracatinib and the VEGF inhibitor cediranib. Patients with disease progression after a parts per thousand yen1 VEGF-targeted therapy were eligible to participate in this double-blind, randomized (1:1) phase II study. The study compared the combination cediranib 30 mg once daily (o.d.) and saracatinib 175 mg o.d. (CS) (n = 69) or cediranib 45 mg o.d. and placebo o.d. (C) (n = 69). Archived tissue was used for biomarker analysis [SRC, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), von Hippel-Lindau, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b and hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha : n = 86]. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. Between 2010 and 2012, 138 patients were randomized across 16 UK sites. The characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. Partial responses were seen in 13.0% for C and 14.5% for CS (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS [5.4 months (3.6-7.3 months) for C and 3.9 (2.4-5.3 months) for CS; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 (0.94-1.48)] or overall survival (OS) [14.2 months (11.2-16.8 months) for C and 10.0 (6.7-13.2 months) for CS; HR 1.28 (1.00-1.63)]. There was no significant difference in the frequency of key adverse events, dose reductions or drug discontinuations. None of the biomarkers were prognostic for PFS or OS. FAK overexpression correlated with an OS benefit [HR 2.29 (1.09-4.82), P > 0.05], but not PFS, for CS. Saracatinib did not increase the efficacy of a VEGF-targeted therapy (cediranib) in this setting. Biomarker analysis did not identify consistent predictive biomarkers. NCT00942877.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available