4.7 Article

Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages 1158-1170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.327

Keywords

Low-carbon city construction; Green total factor productivity; Green growth; Scale and location heterogeneity; Pilot city

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [11ZD040, 18VSJ037]
  2. Foundation for Economic Education (Liikesivistysrahasto) [180019]
  3. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education [19YJCZH168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Faced with the predicament of sustainable development in traditional cities, the low-carbon city, as a novel urban development mode, provides a feasible idea for resolving the tensions among urban development, resource conservation and environmental protection. Using prefecture-level panel data during 2007-2016, we adopt the difference-in-differences model to explore the impact of low-carbon city construction on green growth. Afterward, we estimate the heterogeneity of economic environmental effects on cities, and those effects are attributed to different scales and locations. The robustness tests reveal that low-carbon pilot cities significantly and continuously benefit in terms of the green total factor productivity through technical effects being partly transformed into green technical progress and structural effects. Additionally, the construction of low-carbon cities has scale economy and regional differences. Cities with larger scales, more complete infrastructure and better foundations for technology have more significantly positive effects on green growth. These findings also apply to cities in similar developing countries seeking to achieve economic transformation and green growth. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available