4.7 Article

Treatment of automotive paint wastewater in continuous-flow electroflotation reactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages 335-346

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.326

Keywords

Electroflotation; Automotive paint; Wastewater treatment; Modelling; Energy efficiency; Continuous-flow reactor

Funding

  1. University of Western Ontario
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With painting operations as a major origin of environmental concerns in automotive industry, novel and effective technologies are required for treatment of automotive paint wastewater. In this experimental study, a continuous-flow electroflotation reactor with effective volume of 38.4 L and stainless-steel electrodes were designed and implemented for treatment of this industrial wastewater. The system performance, namely the total suspended solids removal, was investigated with operational parameters including the hydraulic retention time, current density and influent total solids concentration. The removal rate ranged between 57 +/- 1% and 95 +/- 7% under initial total solids concentration 3000 mg/L, current density 50 A/m(2), retention time 4 min, and initial total solids concentration 500 mg/L, current density 100 A/m(2), retention time 8 min conditions, respectively. It was found that the removal rate decreases with the increase of influent total solids concentration. The results revealed that the suspended solids removal rate is directly related to the applied current density and hydraulic retention time. The electroflotation system showed to be energy-efficient compared to the commercial systems. Further, an empirical equation for the total suspended solids removal rate was established with the R-2 value of 92.74%. The independent variables were the retention time, influent suspended solids concentration and applied current density. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available