4.7 Article

Understanding employee's electricity conservation behavior in workplace: Do normative, emotional and habitual factors matter?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages 1070-1077

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.173

Keywords

Employee's electricity conservation behavior; Positive anticipated emotion; Negative anticipated emotion; Electricity conservation habit; Personal norm

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71804174, 71601174, 71571172]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LQ17G030010]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632555]
  4. National Social Science Foundation of China [17CGL046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Employee's electricity conservation behavior in workplace is beneficial to reduce electricity consumption and carbon emissions. This research aims to analyze how normative (e.g., personal norm, subjective norm and descriptive norm), emotional (e.g., positive and negative anticipated emotion) and habitual factors (e.g., electricity conservation habit) affect employee's electricity conservation behavior in workplace. The research data were collected from 309 employees in four Chinese cities using a questionnaire survey. The results indicated that employee's personal norm, subjective norm, descriptive norm, negative and positive anticipated emotions and electricity conservation habit are all positively and significantly affect employee's intention to conserve electricity in workplace. Moreover, personal norm has the largest effect. The results also suggested that demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, educational level and income level) have no significant effects on employee's intention to conserve electricity. The current research highlighted the importance of normative, emotional and habitual factors and contributed to the research on employee's electricity conservation behavior in workplace. Based on the research findings, the relevant policy implications were proposed and recommendations for following research were discussed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available