4.6 Article

Amphiphilic triptycene-based stationary phase for high-resolution gas chromatographic separations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1599, Issue -, Pages 239-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.04.033

Keywords

Gas chromatography; Triptycene-based stationary phase; Amphiphilic selectivity; Positional isomers; Anilines and phenols

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575013]
  2. Analysis AMP
  3. Testing Center, Beijing Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports a new type of triptycene-based amphiphilic stationary phase (TP-2IL) for gas chromatography (GC). It is an integration of the 3D pi-rich triptycene framework with ionic liquids. Its capillary column showed the efficiency of 3880 plates/m determined by n-dodecane at 120 degrees C (k=2.79) and exhibited good performance for analytes from apolar to polar nature. Particularly, it has outstanding capability for resolving critical pairs of anilines and phenols with good peak shapes and shows distinct advantages over its composing counterparts (TP-2BO and O-IL) and widely-used commercial columns, namely 35% phenyl methyl polysiloxane (DB-35) and polyethylene glycol (INNOWAX). Moreover, the TP-2IL column exhibited good repeatability and reproducibility with the values of relative standard deviation in the range of 0.02%-0.07% for run-to-run, 0.10%-0.35% for day-to-day and 2.9%-5.1% for column-to-column, respectively, and good thermal stability up to 300 degrees C. Furthermore, its applications for determining isomer impurities in real samples demonstrate its feasibility for practical GC analysis. This work presents a facile strategy for constructing triptycene-based stationary phases with amphiphilic selectivity and provides alternatives of highly selective stationary phases for chromatographic analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available