4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Ionic deep eutectic solvents for the extraction and separation of natural products

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1598, Issue -, Pages 1-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.046

Keywords

Deep eutectic solvents; Ionic liquids; Extraction; Separation; Natural products; Traditional Chinese medicines

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21672188]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY16B020004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Room ionic liquids (ILs) used as green solvents have received considerable attention and wide application in different research and industrial fields, such as chemistry, biology, catalysis, energy, and even environmental sciences. Recently, a new class of sustainable solvents named deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have been developed, which share the promising solvent characteristics of ILs, such as thermal and chemical stability, low vapor pressure and design ability. In addition, the major advantages of DESs over ILs are their lower prices and easier preparation. Therefore, DESs have been considered to be a potential alternative to replace conventional organic solvents and ILs. Currently, the developed DESs may be classified into ionic and nonionic liquids. Typically, choline chloride (ChCI)/urea (1:2) is an ionic DES, while glucose/sucrose (1:1) is a nonionic DES. Although several reviews have covered advancements in DESs, in this review, we aim to provide a general insight into DESs, particularly ionic DESs, like choline-based DES, in terms of their preparation and application in the extraction of natural products (NPs) mainly from traditional Chinese medicines and the recovery of extracted compounds from their extracts. Additionally, various factors affecting the extraction efficiency of DESs are discussed. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available