4.7 Article

Rhes travels from cell to cell and transports Huntington disease protein via TNT-like protrusion

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue 6, Pages 1972-1993

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201807068

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Lottie French Lewis Fund of the Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01-NS087019-01A1, R01-NS094577-01A1]
  3. Cure Huntington Disease Initiative (CHDI) foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tunneling nanotubes (TNT) are thin, membranous, tunnel-like cell-to-cell connections, but the mechanisms underlying their biogenesis or functional role remains obscure. Here, we report, Rhes, a brain-enriched GTPase/SUMO E3-like protein, induces the biogenesis of TNT-like cellular protrusions, Rhes tunnels, through which Rhes moves from cell to cell and transports Huntington disease (HD) protein, the poly-Q expanded mutant Huntingtin (mHTT). The formation of TNT-like Rhes tunnels requires the Rhes's serine 33, C-terminal CAAX, and a SUMO E3-like domain. Electron microscopy analysis revealed that TNT-like Rhes tunnels appear continuous, cell-cell connections, and <200 nm in diameter. Live-cell imaging shows that Rhes tunnels establish contact with the neighboring cell and deliver Rhes-positive cargoes, which travel across the plasma membrane of the neighboring cell before entering it. The Rhes tunnels carry Rab5a/Lyso 20-positive vesicles and transport mHTT, but not normal HTT, mTOR, or wtTau proteins. SUMOylation-defective mHTT, Rhes C263S (cannot SUMOylate mHTT), or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated depletion of three isoforms of SUMO diminishes Rhes-mediated mHTT transport. Thus, Rhes promotes the biogenesis of TNT-like cellular protrusions and facilitates the cell-cell transport of mHTT involving SUMO-mediated mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available