4.8 Article

Platinum nanoparticles supported on mesocellular silica foams as highly efficient catalysts for enantioselective hydrogenation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 373, Issue -, Pages 306-313

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.04.006

Keywords

Enantioselective; Heterogeneous; Catalysis; Hydrogenation; Mesoporous silica

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, South Korea [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03034370]
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), South Korea [NRF-2019R1C1C1002846]
  3. POSTECH Basic Science Research Institute, South Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesocellular silica foams (MCFs) with different pore size were synthesized and used as supports for Pt catalysts for enantioselective hydrogenation of ethyl pyruvate. The influences of the pore size of MCFs, the amount of Pt loading and H-2 pressure on catalytic performance of cinchonidine-modified Pt/MCFs were investigated. Both activity and enantioselectivity of the Pt/MCF catalyst increased with the increase in the pore size. These results were attributed to the fact that the larger mesopores facilitate intraparticle diffusion of bulky chiral modifier molecules and generate more chirally modified Pt sites. The performances of Pt/MCFs were compared to those of Pt supported on non-porous silica (Pt/SiO2) and commercial Pt/Al2O3 catalysts. The 1 wt% Pt/MCFs showed superior performance than the 1 wt% Pt/SiO2 and the commercial 1 wt% Pt/Al2O3 catalysts. Furthermore, the 0.6 wt% Pt/MCF exhibited higher activity and enantioselectivity than the commercial 5 wt% Pt/Al2O3, one of the most efficient heterogeneous catalysts for this reaction, in spite of a considerably less Pt loading. At optimized reaction conditions, the Pt/MCF catalyst gave enantiomeric excess of 96% at 100% conversion. They also maintained high enantioselectivity during 10 successive reaction cycles, exhibiting high reusability. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available