4.4 Article

Prognostic Value of International Normalized Ratio in Ischemic Stroke Patients without Atrial Fibrillation or Anticoagulation Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 378-387

Publisher

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.43752

Keywords

Transient ischemic attack; Minor stroke; International normalized ratio; Recurrent stroke; Registries

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1307300, 2016YFC1307301, 2017YFC1310900, 2017YFC1310901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The impact of international normalized ratio (INR) on prognosis after acute ischemic stroke without anticoagulation therapy is unclear. Herein, the association between baseline INR and stroke outcomes in patients without anticoagulation therapy was investigated. Methods: A total of 14,782 ischemic stroke patients from the China National Stroke Registry. were included in this analysis. The period of follow-up was 1 year after stroke onset. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the relationship between INR and stroke outcomes including all-cause death, recurrent stroke, composite end point, and poor functional outcome. Results: Of 14,782 patients with stroke, all-cause death occurred in 1080 (7.3%), recurrence stroke in 538 (3.9%), combined end point in 1319 (8.9%), and poor functional outcome in 3001 (20.3%). Compared with the medium INR group (0.9-1.1), the odds ratios with confidence intervals of 95% for the high INR group (> 1.1) were 1.58 (1.32-1.98) for all-cause death, 1.40 (1.10-1.79) for stroke recurrence, 1.52 (1.29-1.79) for combined end point, and 1.21 (1.06-1.39) for poor functional outcome. No association between low INR (< 0.9) and any stroke outcomes was found compared with the medium group. Conclusions: Increased admission INR was associated with adverse stroke outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients without atrial fibrillation or anticoagulation therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available