4.6 Article

Mechanical properties of 3D parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling: Effect of various fillers in polylactide

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 136, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.47824

Keywords

fused deposition modeling; interlayer bond strength; mechanical properties; polylactide; surface quality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51603205]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1100800]
  3. Talent Cultivation and Recruitment Plan of the Light of West China Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weak mechanical strength and serious mechanical anisotropy are two key limiting factors for three-dimensional (3D) parts prepared by fused deposition modeling (FDM) in industrial applications. In this work, we investigated the relationships between mechanical properties and surface quality of FDM parts with the properties of materials used. Three kinds of polylactide (PLA) filaments, composed of the same PLA matrix but different fillers (carbon fibers and talc), were used to prepare FDM specimens. Due to the nature of FDM process, FDM parts exhibited tensile properties weaker and more anisotropic than their injection-molding counterparts. The presence of fillers affected the tensile properties of FDM parts, especially the degree of mechanical anisotropy. It is found that the interlayer bond governing the mechanical performance of FDM parts was improved since the fillers added in the polymer materials facilitates the molecular diffusion across the bond interface. Also, the surface quality of FDM parts varied with fillers. Neat PLA parts exhibited surface quality superior to the 3D parts printed with composites filaments. This work is believed to provide highlights on the development of polymer composites filament and improvement of mechanical properties of FDM parts. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47824.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available